A　rapid　increase　in　population　causes　quantitative　municipal　solid　wastes　(MSW)　in　Pakistan,　leading　to　serious　public　health　and　environmental　impacts.　Pakistan　has　social　and　environmental　issues　due　to　poor　and　inadequate　waste　management.　Moreover,　solid　waste　in　Pakistan　is　2.4%　per　year　and　0.283　to　0.612　kg/capita/day.　While　the　new　scheme　focuses　primarily　on　waste　collection　and　transportation,　but　the　recovery　rate　is　68%.　Insufficient　waste　collection　and　disposal　would　pollute　the　air,　water,　and　soil　that　may　cause　a　public　health　risk.　The　main　techniques　for　waste　disposal　used　in　Pakistan　include　composting,　landfilling,　open　dumping,　incineration,　anaerobic　digestion,　etc.　However,　these　approaches　are　not　ecological　and　cost-effective.　The　black　soldier＇s　fly　technology　(BSF)　effectively　and　biologically　breaks　down　diverse　biodegradable　wastes　under　sub-tropical　conditions.　Most　people　worldwide　use　BSF　larvae　to　degrade　biodegradable　matter,　especially　in　tropical　and　developing　countries.　BSF　innovation　has　a　high　potential　to　cope　with　the　current　challenges　related　to　inadequate　reliable　waste　management　infrastructure　as　Pakistan　has　favorable　environmental　and　climate　conditions.　It　is　also　capable　of　fostering　regional　growth,　creating　jobs,　and　local　recycling　of　degradable　waste.　Black　soldier　fly　larvae　technology　is　an　environmentally　friendly　and　cost-effective　method　because　of　its　quick　transition　rate,　good　sustainability,　and　low　cost-effectiveness　compared　to　existing　and　other　operating　technologies　in　Pakistan.　Organic　waste　becomes　not　only　useful　after　being　processed　by　BSFL　but　also　produces　high-value　eco-friendly　goods.　This　review　highlights　the　role　of　BSFL　for　waste　management,　its　benefits　in　Pakistan　under　the　current　environmental　condition,　and　the　biodegradation　of　various　organic　wastes　under　subtropical　conditions.　In　this　study,　different　kinds　of　practices　used　in　Pakistan　for　waste　management,　including　open　dumping,　landfilling,　incineration,　and　anaerobic　digestion,　were　compared.　(C)　2021　Elsevier　B.V.　All　rights　reserved.