• 综合
  • 标题
  • 关键词
  • 摘要
  • 学者
  • 期刊-刊名
  • 期刊-ISSN
  • 会议名称
搜索

作者:

Zeng, Hui-Ping (Zeng, Hui-Ping.) | Yin, Can (Yin, Can.) | Li, Dong (Li, Dong.) (学者:李冬) | Lv, Sai-Sai (Lv, Sai-Sai.) | Zhao, Yun-Xin (Zhao, Yun-Xin.) | Zhang, Jie (Zhang, Jie.)

收录:

EI PKU CSCD CSSCI

摘要:

The backwashing residuals from iron and manganese removal biological filter of underground waters was made into granular adsorbent (GA) and magnetic powder adsorbent (MPA) to solve the problem that it is difficult to separate the exhausted backwashing sludge powder adsorbent (BSPA) and treated water. The arsenic removal capability of BSPA, GA and MPA were compared. And their structure and surface feature were compared by SEM, TED, XRD, BET and FTIR to find the cause of difference in arsenic removal capability among these three adsorbents. Results showed that the maximum As (V) adsorption capacity of BSPA, GA and MPA were 40.980, 5.048 and 8.694mg/g respectively. As it suggested, the As (V) adsorption capacity of GA and MPA decreased compared to BSPA. BSPA was a mixture with amorphous structure, lepidocrocite was the main ingredient, goethite and poor crystallized ferrihydrite also mixed in it. The XRD spectrum of GA appeared crystal diffraction peaks of quartz crystal and a small amount of hematite, while the main component of MPA was maghemite with high crystallinity. There are hydroxyl functional groups that are conducive to adsorption in all three materials. The specific surface areas of BSPA, MPA and GA were 253.150, 238.660 and 43.803m2/g respectively. Phase changes and increase of crystallinity, reduction of surface hydroxyl group and decrease of specific surface area may be the main factors lower the adsorption capacity of GA and MPA compared with BSPA. © 2018, Editorial Board of China Environmental Science. All right reserved.

关键词:

Adsorption Chemicals removal (water treatment) Crystallinity Crystals Groundwater Hematite Iron Pollution control Specific surface area X ray diffraction

作者机构:

  • [ 1 ] [Zeng, Hui-Ping]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 2 ] [Yin, Can]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 3 ] [Li, Dong]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 4 ] [Lv, Sai-Sai]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 5 ] [Zhao, Yun-Xin]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 6 ] [Zhang, Jie]Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing; 100124, China
  • [ 7 ] [Zhang, Jie]State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin; 150090, China

通讯作者信息:

  • [zeng, hui-ping]key laboratory of beijing for water quality science and water environment recovery engineering, beijing university of technology, beijing; 100124, china

电子邮件地址:

查看成果更多字段

相关关键词:

来源 :

China Environmental Science

ISSN: 1000-6923

年份: 2018

期: 9

卷: 38

页码: 3373-3379

被引次数:

WoS核心集被引频次: 0

SCOPUS被引频次:

ESI高被引论文在榜: 0 展开所有

万方被引频次:

中文被引频次:

近30日浏览量: 2

在线人数/总访问数:947/2908630
地址:北京工业大学图书馆(北京市朝阳区平乐园100号 邮编:100124) 联系我们:010-67392185
版权所有:北京工业大学图书馆 站点建设与维护:北京爱琴海乐之技术有限公司