With　the　rapid　development　of　computer　science　and　computational　techniques,　numerical　simulations　are　regarded　as　powerful　tools　to　solve　complex　geotechnical　problems　such　as　soil-structure　interaction　effects　on　liquefiable　sites.　For　the　simulation　of　soil　liquefaction,　soil　constitutive　models　play　important　role　in　the　correctly　reproducing　and　interpreting　the　behavior　liquefied　soil　and　so　as　to　the　consequent　soil　structure　interaction　(SSI)　problem.　In　this　study,　a　comparative　work　was　carried　out　to　investigate　the　influence　of　different　soil　constitutive　models　on　SSI　effect　on　a　liquefiable　site.　Two　well　know　soil　constitutive　models　are　exploited:　SANISAND　model　(Dafalias　et　al.　2004)　and　Hypoplastic　model　(von　Wolffersdorff　1996).　These　two　numerical　models　were　first　numerically　implemented　by　semi-explicit　3rd　order　Runge-Kutta　integration　scheme　with　adapting　sub-steps.　The　numerical　implementation　is　done　by　UMAT　subroutines　in　Abaqus.　The　model　parameters　of　these　two　constitutive　models　were　calibrated　using　triaxial　test　data　of　Fontainebleau　sand　(NE34).　The　performance　of　these　two　constitutive　models　is　investigated　numerically　by　comparing　the　seismic　responses　of　a　shallow　foundation　on　the　same　liquefiable　site.　Results　show　that　although　these　two　constitutive　models　can　be　calibrated　successfully　against　oridinary　triaxial　test　data,　their　performance　in　terms　of　a　real　case　SSI　are　different.　The　possible　reasons　are　also　disccussed　in　this　study.　©　2018,　Springer　Nature　Switzerland　AG.